Amateur Filmmaking vs the Normativity of Institutions: The Case of the Invisible Film Festival
https://doi.org/10.58186/2782-3660-2023-3-3-152-174
Abstract
This article explores the “Invisible Film Festival,” focusing on its curatorial, production, and spectator practices. The project was born in 2019 and is still taking place in the “Poryadok slov” bookstore in St. Petersburg. Comparing the curatorial project created by Darina Polikarpova, Ksenia Ilyina and Anastasia Volokhova with the retrospective created by Bruce Posner’s “Unseen cinema” and the thematicization of “the cinema of attractions” after the Brighton conference, the author posits that invisibility is a lasting characteristic of films that require specific production and viewing conditions while possessing distinct cinematic attributes. In terms of production, such films are crafted by amateur filmmakers, which challenges the traditional separation of film production time and space from everyday life that leads to destruction of the existing professional separation of the community of filmmakers.
The use of amateur technology allows the definition of invisible cinema through perceptual qualities, such as “amateur excess” (Rascaroli), “sterile movements” (Lyotard), “poverty” (Brashinsky). The amateur aspect of production and technology also results in the observation that, unlike visible cinema, invisible cinema necessitates a focus on the fragmented and transient elements, thus aligning it more closely with the concept of “pure cinema” as a domain of unrestricted evolution. Ultimately, if we regard invisible cinema as a dispositif, we can anticipate a shift in the dynamics among filmmakers, curators, and spectators within the context of a restructured festival format.
About the Author
D. PolikarpovaRussian Federation
Darina Polikarpova
St. Petersburg
References
1. Brashinsky M. Strannee, chem kraj. Nabroski k istorii “bednogo kino” SSHA [Stranger Than the Edge. Notes on the History of the “Poor Cinema” in USA]. Seans [Seance], April 4, 2016. URL: https://seance.ru/articles/strannee-chem-kraj.
2. Conomos J., Mousoulis B. Unseen Cinema: An Interview with Bruce Posner. Senses of Cinema, 2022, no. 21. URL: https://www.sensesofcinema.com/2002/festival-reports/posner.
3. Deleuze G. Kino [Cinema], Moscow, Ad Marginem Press, 2013.
4. Gunning T. Attractions. How They Came Into the World. The Cinema of Attractions Reloaded (ed. W. Strauven), Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 2006, pp. 31‒40.
5. Howe M. The Photographic Hangover: Reconsidering the Aesthetics of the Postwar 8mm Home Movie. Amateur Filmmaking: The Home Movie, the Archive, the Web (eds L. Rascaroli et al.), London, Bloomsbury, 2014, pp. 39‒ 50.
6. Kessler F. The Cinema of Attractions as Dispositif. The Cinema of Attractions Reloaded (ed. W. Strauven), Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 2006, pp. 57‒70.
7. Kudryashov M. Vvedenie v teoriyu diskursov Lakana: model’ chetyryoh diskursov [An Introduction to Lacan’s Discourse Theory: The Four Discourse Model]. Syg.ma, March 14, 2021. URL: https://syg.ma/@insolarance-cult/vviedieniie-v-tieoriiu-diskursov-lakana-modiel-chietyriokh-diskursov.
8. Lyotard J.-F. L’acinéma. Cineticle, 2020, no. 26. URL: https://cineticle.com/lacinema-jean-francois-lyotard.
9. Mirzoeff N. Pravo na vzglyad [The Right To Look]. Versus, 2021, no. 1 (1), pp. 214‒ 252.
10. Polikarpova D. Ty prishel iz pustoty vo imya krasoty [You Came From the Void in the Name of Beauty]. Colta.ru, December 24, 2019. URL: https://m.colta.ru/articles/cinema/23293-festival-nevidimogo-kino.
11. Rancière J. Ehmansipirovannyi zritel’ [Le Spectateur émancipé], Nizhnii Novgorod, Krasnaya lastochka, 2018.
12. Rancière J. Ehsteticheskoe bessoznatel’noe [ L’inconscient esthétique], Saint Petersburg, Moscow, Machina, 2004.
13. Rancière J. Razdelyaya chuvstvennoe [Le Partage du sensible], Saint-Petersburg, EUSP Press, 2007.
14. Rascaroli L. Working at Home: Tarnation, Amateur Authorship, and Self-Inscription in the Digital Age. Amateur Filmmaking: The Home Movie, the Archive, the Web (eds L. Rascaroli et al.), London, Bloomsbury, 2014, pp. 229‒ 242.
15. Zimmermann P. The Home Movie Archive Live. Amateur Filmmaking: The Home Movie, the Archive, the Web (eds L. Rascaroli et al.), London, Bloomsbury, 2014, pp. 257‒269.
Review
For citations:
Polikarpova D. Amateur Filmmaking vs the Normativity of Institutions: The Case of the Invisible Film Festival. Versus. 2023;3(3):152-174. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.58186/2782-3660-2023-3-3-152-174