Great Dates, or How State Policies of Remembrance Construct History

The main patron and actor in the politics of memorials is the state. It is the state that takes care of compiling a standard list of significant historical events and significant historical figures.
In this regard, the following questions arise. How did the set of historical events that were to be perpetuated and propagandised look in Soviet and post-Soviet times? How and by what criteria was the selection of historical personalities and events made? What features of state policy put the emphasis on these images? How did this memorial policy express the attitude of the authorities to the role of individual and collective in history? How did they reflect the gender element? Finally, what influence did the attitude of the authorities to religion have on the process of memorialisation?
Vivid examples of the official policy of memory are the gazebo in Neskuchny Gardens, which was erected in 1951 in honour of the 800th anniversary of Moscow, and the design of Borovitsky Square with the adjacent Alexander Gardens, which appeared already in the 2010s. What are the similarities and differences between these two examples of memorial policy? It is shown that they share an emphasis on solving political problems with the help of the armed forces (war or revolution), a pronounced masculinity and emphasis on great military victories. This, of course, indicates the government’s positive attitude to war, the military, and the militarisation of history. These monuments are distinguished by their respective attitudes toward history, religion, revolution, war and the role of the masses in history as well as how exactly this characterises the politics of these two different states. These examples serve to explicate Soviet and post-Soviet memorial cultures. Emphasis is placed on the archaisation of thinking and public discourse characteristic of the post-Soviet period.

1. Andreevskii G. Sorokovye gody [1940s], Moscow, Moskovskii rabochii, 2001.

2. Arkhangel’skii A. Sistemnaya arkhaika vmesto bessistemnogo moderna [Systemic Archaicism Instead of Unsystematic Modernity]. Colta, October 12, 2015. URL: https://colta.ru/articles/society/8824-sistemnaya-arhaika-vmesto-bessistemnogo-moderna.

3. Bannikov K. Arkhaicheskii sindrom. O sovremennosti vnevremennogo [Archaic Syndrome. On Contemporariness of Extratemporal]. Otechestvennye zapiski [Domestic Notes], 2013, no. 1, pp. 58–69.

4. Boltunova E. “Prishla beda, otkuda ne zhdali”: kak voina poglotila revolyutsiyu [“Trouble Came Whence It Was Not Expected”: How War Swallowed Up the Revolution]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas [Reserve Stock: Debates on Politics and Culture], 2017, no. 6, pp. 109–128.

5. Bordyugov G., Bukharaev V. Natsional’naya istoricheskaya mysl’ v usloviyakh sovetskogo vremeni [National Historical Thought in the Conditions of the Soviet Time]. Natsional’nye istorii v sovetskom i postsovetskikh gosudarstvakh [National Histories in Soviet and Post-Soviet States], Moscow, AIRO-XX, 1999, pp. 21–72.

6. Bykov V. Zhestokaya pravda voiny. Vospominaniya pekhotintsa [The Brutal Truth of War. Memories of an Infantryman], Moscow, Rodina, 2020.

7. Davydov I. Istoriya bez lat. V zashchitu russkoi svobody i russkoi chelovechnosti [History Without Armor. In Defense of Russian Freedom and Russian Humanity]. Moskovskii tsentr Karnegi [Moscow Carnegie Center], December 5, 2016. URL: http://carnegie.ru/commentary/?fa=66276.

8. Den’ pobedy [Victory Day]. Levada-Center, April 30, 2019. URL: https://levada.ru/2019/04/30/den-pobedy–3/.

9. Dobrenko E. Pozdnii stalinizm. Estetika politiki [Late Stalinism: The Aesthetics of Politics], Moscow, New Literary Observer, 2020, vol. 1.

10. Dubrovskii A. Istorik i vlast’. Istoricheskaya nauka v SSSR i kontseptsiya feodal’noi Rossii v kontekste politiki i ideologii (1930–1950-e gg.) [Historian and Power: Historical Science in the USSR and the Concept of the History of Feudal Russia in the Context of Politics and Ideology (1930-1950s)], Bryansk, Bryanskii gos. un-t, 2005.

11. Ganelin R. Stalin i sovetskaya istoriografiya predvoennykh let [Stalin and the Soviet Historiography of the Prewar Years]. Novyi chasovoi [New Minuteman], 1998, no. 6–7, pp. 102–103.

12. Giesen B. Triumph and Trauma, Boulder, CO, London, Paradigm Publishers, 2004.

13. Gill G. Symbolism and Regime Change: Russia, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013.

14. Gudkov L. 1917 god v strukture legitimnosti rossiiskoi vlasti [1917 in the Structure of the Legitimacy of the Russian Government]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas [Reserve Stock: Debates on Politics and Culture], 2017, no. 6, pp. 154–172.

15. Gudkov L. Balans dostizhenii i neudach Putina [Putin’s Balance of Achievements/Failures]. Levada-Center, April 8, 2021. URL: https://levada.ru/2021/04/08/balans-dostizhenij-i-neudach-putina.

16. Gudkov L. Massovaya identichnost’ i institutsional’noe nasilie [Mass Identity and Institutional Violence]. Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya [The Russian Public Opinion Herald], 2003, no. 1, pp. 28–44.

17. Gudkov L. Raznitsa v predstavleniyakh i politicheskikh ustanovkakh mezhdu putinskoi elitoi i osnovnoi massoi naseleniya okazalas’ nichtozhnoi [The Discrepancy in Perception and Attitudes Between the Putin’s Elites and the Mass of the Population Was Negligible]. Istoricheskaya ekspertiza [Historical Expertise], 2021, no. 1, pp. 94–114.

18. Istoricheskaya politika v XXI veke [Historical Politics in the XXI century], Moscow, New Literary Observer, 2012.

19. Kalinin I. Prizrak yubileya [The Ghost of the Jubilee]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas [Reserve Stock: Debates on Politics and Culture], 2017, no. 1, pp. 11–20.

20. King D. Propavshie komissary. Fal’sifikatsiya fotografii i proizvedenii iskusstva v stalinskoi Rossii [Missing Commissars. Falsification of Photographs and Works of Art in Stalinist Russia], Moscow, Kontakt-kul’tura, 2005.

21. Kolonitskii B., Matskevich M. Desakralizatsiya revolyutsii i antirevolyutsionnyi konsensus v sovremennoi Rossii: yubilei 2017 goda i ego politicheskoe ispol’zovanie/neispol’zovanie [Desacralization of Revolution and Anti-Revolutionary Consensus in Modern Russia: The 2017 Jubilee and its Political Execution/Non-Execution]. Mir Rossii [World of Russia], 2018, no. 4, pp. 78–101.

22. Koposov N. Pamyat’ starogo rezhima: istoriya i politika v Rossii [Memory of the Old Regime: History and Politics in Russia], Moscow, New Literary Observer, 2011.

23. Korzhavin N. V soblaznakh krovavoi epokhi [In the Temptations of a Bloody Era]. Novyi mir [New World], 1992, no. 7, pp. 154–212.

24. Kostyrchenko G. Stalin protiv “kosmopolitov”. Vlast’ i evreiskaya intelligentsiya v SSSR [Stalin versus “Sosmopolitans”. Power and the Jewish Intelligentsia in the USSR], Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2010.

25. Kostyrchenko G. V plenu u krasnogo faraona [Captive of the Red Pharaoh], Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1994.

26. Kustova E. Neudobnyi yubilei: stoletie russkoi revolyutsii [Inconvenient Anniversary: the Centennial of the Russian Revolution]. Rossiya 2017: Ezhegodnyi doklad Franko-rossiiskogo analiticheskogo tsentra Observo [Russia 2017: Observo French-Russian Analytical Center Annual Report], Moscow, Novyi vek, 2017, pp. 456–464.

27. L’yuis S. “Partizanskaya respublika”: kolonial’nye mify i voina za pamyat’ v Belarusi [The “Partisan Republic”: Colonial Myths and Memory Wars in Belarus]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Observer], 2020, no. 6, pp. 350–371.

28. Laruelle M. Accusing Russia of Fascism. Polemics around Russia’s Belonging to Europe. Russia in Global Affairs, 2020, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 100–123.

29. Levinson A. V Rossii predpochitayut dumat’, chto voiny net [In Russia They Prefer to Think That There Is No War]. Levada-Center, March 4, 2022. URL: https://levada.ru/2022/03/04/v-rossii-predpochitayut-dumat-chto-vojny-net/.

30. Levinson A. Voina ne ukhodit [The War Is Not Going Away]. Levada-Center, June 21, 2016. URL: http://levada.ru/2016/06/21/vojna-ne-uhodit/.

31. Linde F. State Сivilization: the Statist Core of Vladimir Putin’s Civilizational Discourse and its Implications for Russian Foreign Policy. Politics in Central Europe, 2016, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 21–35.

32. Linde F. The Civilizational Turn in Russian Political Discourse: From Pan-Europeanism to Civilizational Distinctiveness. Russian Review, 2016, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 604–625.

33. Malinova O. Problema politicheski “prigodnogo” proshlogo i evolyutsiya ofitsial’noi simvolicheskoi politiki v postsovetskoi Rossii [The Problem of a Politically “Fit“ Past and the Evolution of Official Symbolic Politics in Post-Soviet Russia]. Politicheskaya kontseptologiya [Political Conceptology], 2013, no. 1, pp. 114–130.

34. Malinova O. Yu. Neudobnyi yubilei: itogi pereosmysleniya mifa “osnovaniya SSSR” v ofitsial’nom istoricheskom narrative RF [Inconvenient Anniversary: The Results of Rethinking the Myth of the “Founding of the USSR” in the Official Historical Narrative of the Russian Federation]. Politicheskaya nauka [Political Science], 2017, no. 3, pp. 13–40.

35. Miller A. Politika pamyati v postkommunisticheskoi Evrope i ee vozdeistvie na evropeiskuyu kul’turu pamyati [Politics of Memory in Post-Communist Europe and Its Impact on the European Culture of Memory]. Politiya [Politeia], 2016, no. 1, pp. 111–121.

36. Mininkov N. Revolyutsiya v Rossii nachala XX veka kak umirayushchee mesto istoricheskoi pamyati [Revolution in Russia at the Beginning of the 20th Century as A Dying Place of Historical Memory]. Novoe proshloe [The New Past], 2020, no. 2, pp. 102–114.

37. Nora P. Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations, 1989, vol. 26, pp. 7–24.

38. Otkrytie Rzhevskogo memoriala Sovetskomu soldatu [Opening of the Rzhev Memorial to the Soviet Soldier]. Prezident Rossii [President of Russia], June 30, 2020. URL: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/63585.

39. Poselyanin E. N. Prepodobnyi Serafim, Sarovskii chudotvorets i russkie podvizhniki XIX veka [Venerable Seraphim, the Miracle Worker of Sarov and Russian Ascetics of the 19th Century], Moscow, Aksios, 2003.

40. Reverend Serafim of Sarov Chudotvorets. Diveevskaya taina i predskazaniya o Voskreshenii Rossii [Diveyevsky: Mystery and Prophecy of the Resurrection of Russia], Moscow, Veche, 2010.

41. Schnirelmann V. Geopolitika, katekhon i novyi irratsionalizm. Paper delivered at XXVI Bathroom Readings, on the conference “Mezhdu razumom i veroi: svetskaya i religioznaya kul’tury v epokhu (post)modernosti” [Between Reason and Faith: Secular and Religious Cultures in (Post)modern Age]. Moscow, March 29–30, 2009. URL: http://youtube.com/watch?v=TGRqcVXh_hI.

42. Schnirelmann V. Manezh 2013–2016: publichnaya istoriya Rossii dlya naroda? Vystavki v Manezhe kak instrumental’nyi podkhod k istorii [Manege 2013–2016: A Public History of Russia for the People? Manege Exhibitions as an Instrumental Approach to History]. Istoricheskaya ekspertiza [Historical Expertise], 2018, no. 3, pp. 92–116.

43. Schnirelmann V. Sotsial’naya pamyat’ — voprosy teorii [Social Memory — Questions of Theory]. In: Istoricheskaya pamyat’ i rossiiskaya identichnost’ [Historical memory and Russian Identity], Moscow, RAS, 2018, pp. 12–24.

44. Shelin S. Nash put’ — varvarizatsiya [Our Path Is That of Barbarisation]. Rosbalt, December 12, 2015. URL: http://rosbalt.ru/blogs/2015/12/12/1470681.html.

45. Shimov Ya. “Ded natsii” i preemniki. Rossiya i Evropa na chetvertom sroke Putina [“Grandfather of the Nation” and the Successors. Russia and Europe During Putin’s 4th Term]. Radio Svoboda, February 15, 2018. URL: http://svoboda.org/a/29037222.html.

46. Shoigu i ne ego milliardy — kak i na chto stroili “khram voiny”. Neprostaya doroga k glavnomu soboru Minoborony [Shoigu and That Billions Which Do Not Belong to Him — How and with What Funds the “Temple of War” Was Built. The Difficult Road to the Main Cathedral of the Ministry of Defense]. pasmi. ru, May 6, 2020. URL: http://pasmi.ru/archive/267841/.

47. Shteynman M. Political Myth and Political Glory: Shaping Media Reality. Russian Sociological Review, 2016, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 96–113.

48. Sperling V. Putin’s macho personality cult. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 2016, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 13–23.

49. Toimentsev S. Avtoritarizm s chelovecheskim litsom: sovetskii geroi v postsovetskom baiopike [Authoritarianism with a Human Face: The Soviet Hero in the Post-Soviet Biopic]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Observer], 2020, no. 5, pp. 129–147.

50. Tsygankov A. Crafting the State-Civilization Vladimir Putin’s Turn to Distinct Values. Problems of Post-Communism, 2016, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 146–158.

51. Van Ree E. Heroes and Merchants. Stalin’s Understanding of National Character. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 2007, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 41–65.

52. Vol’noe istoricheskoe obshchestvo. Kakoe proshloe nuzhno budushchemu Rossii [The Free Historical Society. What Kind of Past Does Russia‘s Future Need], Moscow, VIO, 2017.

53. Volkov D. Putin uveren, chto grazhdane Rossii podderzhivayut priznanie DNR i LNR. No tak li eto na samom dele? [Putin is Sure that Russian Citizens Support the Recognition of the DPR and LPR. But is this really the case?]. Levada-Center, February 24, 2022. URL: http://levada.ru/2022/02/24/putin-uveren-chto-grazhdane-rossii-podderzhivayut-priznanie-dnr-i-lnr-no-tak-li-etona-samom-dele-intervyu-denisa-volkova/.

54. Weiner A. Making Sense of War: The Second World War and the Fate of the Bolshevik Revolution, Princeton, Oxford, Princeton University Press, 2001.