From Literature to Philosophy
Abstract
The article presents the possible paths to the philological development of the first translated and little-known work of Walter Benjamin The Role of Language in Trauerspiel and Tragedy. Based on the key problematics of the fragment, associated with the expressive possibilities of language, and by focusing on the features of the unusual philosophical speech, it is possible to consider the text as part of the tradition of poetic speaking in the spirit of Michel de Montaigne. The resonance of readers’ impressions of Benjamin, connecting the works of Shakespeare and Goethe with the legacy of expressionist poets, speaks to the philosopher’s unique understanding of the verbal side of his own reflections. A striking organic fusion of the factors “how is it said?” and “about what is said?” in Benjamin’s text is demonstrated by a selective analysis of individual phrases supported by appeals to the modern theory of poetry. Balancing on the borders of philosophy, literature, and philology, Benjamin aims to create the optimal conditions for language, traditionally striving to demonstrate the maximum extent of his capabilities in the artistic sphere. Such an orientation of the philosopher determines the fundamental similarity of his early fragment and the elements of the history of literature that are relevant today — from reflections of Friedrich Schlegel “On Incomprehensibility” and Heinrich von Kleist “On the Gradual Construction of Thoughts During Speech” to Joseph Brodsky’s famous formula “the poet is the means or instrument of language” and the broadest ideas about literary communication that form modern experimental creativity. As a result, it turns out that Benjamin’s legacy is a well-functioning prism that allows us to consider how the painful feeling of insufficient verbal resources and the acute need for diverse attempts, through poetic means, to study and expand the expressive possibilities of speech are manifested in art of the XX and early XXI centuries.
About the Author
Juliana KaminskajaRussian Federation
Saint Petersburg
References
1. An Hölderlin: Zeitgenössische Gedichte (Hg. H. Gnüg), Stuttgart, Reclam, 1993.
2. Benjamin W. Frants Kafka [Franz Kafka], Moscow, Ad Marginem, 2013.
3. Benjamin W. Proiskhozhdenie nemetskoi barochnoi dramy [Ursprung des deutschen Trauerspiels], Moscow, Agraf, 2002.
4. Benjamin-Handbuch: Leben — Werk — Wirkung (Hg. B. Lindner), Stuttgart, Weimar, Metzler.
5. Bertolt Brecht: „W B“. Frankfurter Allgemeine, December 15, 2017. URL: http: //faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/buecher/frankfurter-anthologie/frankfurter-anthologie-w-b-von-bertolt-brecht-15342379.html.
6. Brodsky J. Evropeiskii vozdukh nad Rossiei’: interv’iu Anni Epel’buen [European Air Over Russia: An Interview by Annie Epelboin]. Bol’shaya kniga interv’yu [Big Book of Interviews], Moscow, Zakharov, 2000, pp. 130–153.
7. Chaouli M. Die “Verwandtschaftstafeln der Buchstaben” und das große Lalula der Romantik. “Fülle der combination”: Literaturforschung und Wissensgeschichte (Hg. B. J. Dotzler, S. Weigel), München, Wilhelm Fink, 2005, S. 101–125.
8. Draesner U. Einflüsse. Ulrike Draesner. URL: http://draesner.de/einfluesse/.
9. Friedrich G. Struktura sovremennoi liriki: Ot Bodlera do serediny dvadtsatogo stoletiya [The Structure of Contemporary Lyrics: From Baudelaire to the Mid-Twentieth Century], Moscow, Iazyki slavianskikh kul’tur, 2010.
10. Friedrich H. Die Struktur der modernen Lyrik: von Baudelaire bis zur Gegenwart, Hamburg, Rowohlt, 1959.
11. Grass G. Iz dnevnika ulitki [From the Diary of a Snail]. Sobr. soch.: V 4 t. [Collected Works: In 4 vols], Khar’kov, Folio, 1997, vol. 3.
12. Grenzüberschneidungen: Ein Polylog der Visuellen Poesie (Hg. J. Kaminskaja, G. Vallaster), Wien, edition ch, 2010.
13. Grenzüberschneidungen: Poesie Visuell Interkulturell (Hg. G. Vallaster), Wien, edition ch, 2006.
14. Heinle Ch. F. Lyrik und Prosa (Hg. J. Steizinger), Berlin, Kulturverlag Kadmos, 2016.
15. Homann R. Theorie der Lyrik: Heautonome Autopoiesis als Paradigma der Moderne. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1999.
16. Khlebnikov V. Bobeobi pelis’ guby… [Bo-beh-oh-bee is the Lipsong…]. Tvoreniya [Artworks], Moscow, Sovetskii pisatel’, 1987.
17. Knörrich O. Lexikon lyrischer Formen, Stuttgart, Kröner, 2005.
18. Lamping D. Das lyrische Gedicht: Definitionen zu Theorie und Geschichte der Gattung, Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2000.
19. Manheimer V. Die Lyrik des Andreas Gryphius: Studien und Materialien, Berlin, Die Lyrik des Andreas Gryphius, 1904.
20. Menninghaus W. Unendliche Verdopplung: Die Frühromantische Grundlegung der Kunstkritik im Begriff absoluter Selbstreflexion, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1987.
21. Montaigne M. Opyty [Experiments]. Izbr. soch.: V 3 t. [Selected Works: In 3 vols], Moscow, Golos, 1992, vol. 3.
22. Novalis Ucheniki v Saise [The Disciples at Sais]. Nemezkaya romanticheskaya povest’: V 2 t. [German Romantic Novel: In 2 vols], Moscow, Academia, 1935, vol. 1, pp. 109–144.
23. Pushkin A. S. Table-talk. Poln. sobr. soch.: V 10 t. [Complete Works: In 10 vols], Moscow, Nauka, 1962–1965, vol. 8, pp. 89–115.
24. Richard L. Entsiklopediya ekspressionizma [Encyclopedia of Expressionism], Moscow, 2003.
25. Romashko S. Dramatika literatury i dramatika zhizni: K istorii knigi Val’tera Ben’yamina [Drama of Literature and the Drama of Life: to the History of Walter Benjamin’s Book]. In: Benjamin W. Proiskhozhdenie nemetskoi barochnoi dramy [Ursprung des deutschen Trauerspiels], Moscow, Agraf, 2002, pp. 272–281.
26. Schlegel F. Athenäums-Fragment Nr. 116. Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, München, Paderborn, Wien, Schöningh, 1967, Bd. 2.
27. Scholem G. Walter Benjamin: die Geschichte einer Freundschaft, Berlin, Suhrkamp, 2016.
28. Schönert J., Huhn P., Stein M. Lyrik und Narratologie: Text-Analysen zu deutschsprachigen Gedichten vom 16. zum 20. Jahrhundert, Berlin, New York, De Gruyter, 2007.
29. Sedel’nik V. D. Dadaizm i dadaisty [Dadaism and the Dadaists], Moscow, IMLI RAN, 2010.
30. Shakespeare W. Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, London, J. M. Dent, 1897.
31. Shakespeare W. Tragediya o Hamlete, printse Datskom [The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark]. Poln. sobr. soch.: V 8 t. [Complete Works: In 8 vols], Leningrad, Academia, 1936, vol. 5, p. 1–175.
32. Steizinger J. Zwischen Jugendbewegung und literarischer Avantgarde: Das Leben von Christoph Friedrich Heinle 1894-1914. In: Heinle Ch. F. Lyrik und Prosa (Hg. J. Steizinger), Berlin, Kulturverlag Kadmos, 2016, S. 149–183.
33. Von Kleist H. Über die allmähliche Verfertigung der Gedanken beim Reden. Sämtliche Werke. Brandenburger Ausgabe, Frankfurt am Main, Basel, Stroemfeld, 2007, Bd. 2 (9).
34. Waldschmidt Ch. “Dunkles zu sagen”: Deutschsprachige hermetische Lyrik im 20. Jahrhundert, Heidelberg, Universitätsverlag Winter, 2011.
Review
For citations:
Kaminskaja J. From Literature to Philosophy. Versus. 2022;2(2):182-208. (In Russ.)