From “Trans-” and “Post-nationalism” to “Critical Cosmopolitanism”. Notes on the Controversy Over Nationalism in the Western Academy

This article provides an overview of theoretical efforts to overcome nation-centrism that have been undertaken in various fields of social science, including political science, cultural studies, social anthropology and macrosociology, migration studies, and social philosophy, from the 1990s. The opposition to nationalism, characteristic of the academic literature of that time, was conducted mainly on the epistemological plane; i.e., within the framework of polemics engaging “methodological nationalism”. The researchers who defended the positions of “transnationalism” and/or “post-nationalism” dissociated themselves from nation-centric perspectives to the extent that they hindered the productive analysis of transformations of social reality. However, there was an ideological and normative component to this dissociation. Nationalism was unacceptable for many scientists both as a methodology and also as a worldview. Since cosmopolitanism was the main opponent of the nationalist worldview, critics of nationalism were obliged to turn to its associated concepts. The problematic nature of such an appeal, however, lies in the fact that the cosmopolitan tradition of Western academic literature developed mainly within a liberal ideological fold. This led toward efforts to reset cosmopolitanism as an articulation of the left-leaning agenda. This present article focuses on “critical cosmopolitanism”. If the nationalist view sees the condition for the possibility of solidarity in the very fact of community, then the critical-cosmopolitan view is that solidarity can arise from a general disagreement with oppression (in whatever forms the latter may manifest itself). Community, therefore, does not precede solidarity, but is the result of the process of its formation. The author of the article analyses and revises the terms necessary to discuss the formation of solidarity and the fight against oppression, and offers an attempt to comprehend the possibility of a post-national world.

1. “Zhit’ v dvukh mirakh”: pereosmyslyaya transnatsionalizm i translokal’nost’ [Living in Two Worlds: Rethinking Transnationalism and Translocality] (eds S. Abashin, O. Brednikova), Moscow, New Literary Observer, 2020.

2. Agnew J. The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1994, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 53–80.

3. Appadurai A. Global Ethnospaces: Notes and Queries for a Transnational Anthropology. Recapturing Anthropology (ed. R. Fox), Santa Fe, NM, School of American Research Press, 1991, pp. 191–210.

4. Balibar E. We, the People of Europe? Reflexions on Transnational Citizenship, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2004.

5. Bash L., Click Schiller N., Szanton Blank C. Nations Unbound: Transnational Projects, Postcolonial Predicaments and Deterritorialized Nation-States, Amsterdam, Gordon & Breach, 1994.

6. Beck U. Obshchestvo riska: na puti k drugomu modernu [Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity], Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya, 2000.

7. Beck U. Vlast’ i ee opponenty v ehpokhu globalizma [Power in the Global Age], Moscow, Territoriya budushchego, 2007.

8. Briggs L., McCormick G., Way J. T. Transnationalism: A Category of Analysis. American Quarterly, 2008, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 625–648.

9. Brubaker R. Introduction. Idem. Grounds for Difference, Cambridge, London, Harvard University Press, 2015.

10. Çağlar A., Glick Schiller N. Migrants and City-Making: Dispossession, Displacement and Urban Regeneration, Durham, London, Duke University Press, 2018. Dahinden J. Transnationalism reloaded: the historical trajectory of the concept. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2017, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1474–1485.

11. Florida R. Kto tvoi gorod? Kreativnaya ehkonomika i vybor mesta zhitel’stva [Who’s Your City?: How the Creative Economy Is Making Where You Live the Most Important Decision of Your Life], Moscow, Strelka Press, 2014.

12. Frank A. G. Razvitie nerazvitosti [Developing Undevelopment]. Left. Ru, September, 2005. URL: http://left.ru/2005/9/frank126.phtml.

13. Gilroy P. Cultural Studies and Ethnic Absolutism. Cultural Studies (eds L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, P. Treichler), London, Routledge, Chapmin and Hall Inc, 1992, pp. 187–198.

14. Glick Schiller N., Basch L., Blanc-Szanton C. Towards a transnational perspective on migration: race, class, ethnicity and nationalism reconsidered. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, July 1992, vol. 645, iss. 1, pp. ix–xv, 1–24.

15. Glick Schiller N., Çağlar A. Displacement, emplacement and migrant newcomers: Rethinking urban sociabilities within multiscalar power. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 2016, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 17–34.

16. Habermas J. Postnatsional’naya konstellyatsiya i budushchee demokratii [The Postnational Constellation and the Future of Democracy]. Logos. Filosofsko-literaturnyi zhurnal [Logos. Philosophical and Literary Journal], 2003, no. 4–5, pp. 105–152.

17. Hannerz U. Cosmopolitans and locals in world culture. Theory, Culture and Society, 1990, vol. 7, no. 2–3, pp. 237–251.

18. Hansen R. The Poverty of Postnationalism: Citizenship, Immigration and the New Europe. Theory and Society, 2009, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–24.

19. Harvey D. A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005.

20. Kagarlitsky B. Yu. Marksizm: ne rekomendovano dlya obucheniya [Marxism: Not Recommended for Learning], Moscow, Algoritm, EKSMO, 2005.

21. Nussbaum M. Otvet kritikam [Reply to critics], Logos, 2006, no. 2, pp. 132–140.

22. Nussbaum M. Patriotizm i kosmopolitizm [Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism], Logos, 2006, no. 2, pp. 110–119.

23. Omae К. The End of the Nation-State: The Rise of the Regional Economies, New York, London, The Free Press, 1995.

24. Portes A., Guarnizo L. E., Landolt P. The Study of Transnationalism: Pitfalls and Promises of Emergent Research Field. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1999, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 217–237.

25. Sassen S. Towards Post-National and Denationalized Citizenship. Handbook of Citizenship Studies (eds E. F. Isin, B. S. Turner), London, Sage, 2002, pp. 277–291.

26. Soysal Y. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1994.

27. Vertovec S. Conceiving and researching Transnationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1999, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 447–462.

28. Vertovec S. Transnationalism, London, New York, Routledge, 2009.

29. Whose Cosmopolitanism: Critical Perspectives, Relationalities and Discontents (eds N. Glick Schiller, A. Irving), New York, Berghahn Books, 2015.

30. Wimmer A., Glick Schiller N. Metodologicheskii natsionalizm i za ego predelami: natsiostroitel’stvo, migratsiya i obshchestvennye nauki [Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation-state building, migration and the social sciences]. Sotsiologiya vlasti [Sociology of Power], 2021, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 184–232.