Virus vs Control: Two fears of One Pandemic

In the spring of 2020, online discussions revealed two conflicting views on threats posed by the pandemic. Some were very worried about the prospect of infection and mass deaths from the new virus, while others saw the main danger lying in restrictive measures and increased social control. This article is an attempt to answer the question as to why some Russians reacted more sensitively to the epidemiological threat and others to the danger of increased control. Medically sensitive Internet users describe themselves and their opponents in terms of social and cultural differences. Covid dissidents distinguish themselves from their ideological opponents on the criterion of the presence or absence of agency. Sociological studies show that this or that type of sensitivity is determined in part by socio-economic status. The reaction to the pandemic is weakly related to political preferences, but it is influenced by the level of trust in the state and official institutions. In-depth interviews with COVID-dissidents and analysis of their rhetoric in social media show that sensitivity to the threat of control is determined by the personal “setting”, in which the experience of “agency panic” (Timothy Melley) plays an important role. In some people the “panic of agency” triggers the signal “danger of control” in a situation where others perceive the administration of necessary security measures. This signal either “overrides” the signal of a biological threat, or encourages a person who is busy asserting his own agency to cope with a biological threat without the participation of authorities and official experts, in the most autonomous mode.

1. Ackerman D. Before face masks, Americans went to war against seat belts. Business Insider, May 26, 2020. URL: http://businessinsider.com/when-americans-went-to-war-against-seat-belts-2020-5#:~:text=In%20the%20early%201980s%2C%20the,Ralph%20Nader%20told%20Business%20Insider).

2. Artamonov R., Lavrent’ev N. Opros obshchestvennogo mneniya naseleniya RF. Izmeneniya, vyzvannye ehpidemiei i rezhimom samoizolyatsii. Sed’maya volna [Russian Federation Public Opinion Research. Changes Caused by Pandemic and Self-Isolation Regime. Seventh Wave]. Higher School of Economics, June 3, 2020. URL: http://hse.ru/data/2020/06/03/1602506343/HSE_Covid_03_2020_1_1.pdf.

3. Bourdieu P. Razlichenie: sotsial’naya kritika suzhdeniya [La Distinction. Critique sociale du jugement]. Ehkonomicheskaya sotsiologiya [Economic Sociology], 2005, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 25–48.

4. Butchirddygari L. How Concerned Are Americans About Coronavirus So Far? There’s Evidence Republicans and Democrats Are Split, But That Could Easily Change. Five Thirty Eight, March 13, 2020. URL: http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-concerned-are-americans-about-coronavirus-so-far/.

5. Christiansen M. What Is the Purpose of Government? The Great Rebel Barbers of Lockdown Philosophy. Youtube, May 13, 2020. URL: http://youtube.com/watch?v=xIM3hkxsuck.

6. Harding S., Stewart C. Anxieties of Influence: Conspiracy Theory and Therapeutic Culture in Millennial America. Transparency and Conspiracy: Ethnographies of Suspicion in the New World Order (eds H. G. West, T. Sanders), London, Durham, Duke University Press, 2003, pp. 258—288.

7. Kholyavin A. Sotsial’noe bezdeistvie na rannikh ehtapakh pandemii COVID-19 [Social Inaction at Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemics]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 2020, no. 11, pp. 139–148.

8. Kirziuk A. “U menya net strakha”: kovid-dissidenty v poiskakh agentnosti i pravdy [“I Have No Fear”: COVID Skeptics in Search of Agency and Truth]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes], 2021, no. 2, pp. 484–509.

9. Loginov D. Sotsial’noe samochuvstvie rossiiskogo naseleniya v period ostroi fazy ehpidemiologicheskogo krizisa [Social Well-Being of the Russian Population During the Acute Stage of the Epidemiological Crisis]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes], 2020, no. 6, pp. 470–487.

10. Makusheva M., Nestik T. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie predposylki i ehffekty doveriya sotsial’nym institutam v usloviyakh pandemii [Socio-Psychological Preconditions and Effects of Trust in Social Institutions in a Pandemic]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes], 2020, no. 6, pp. 427–447.

11. Melley T. Empire of Conspiracy: The Culture of Paranoia in Postwar America, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2000.

12. Obshchestvo i pandemiya: opyt i uroki bor’by s COVID-19 v Rossii [Society and a Pandemic. Experience and lessons of combatting COVID-19 in Russia], Moscow, 2020.

13. Over 60% of Israelis Back Harsh Restrictions on COVID-19 Unvaccinated. Jerusalem Post, January 9, 2022. URL: http://jpost.com/health-and-wellness/coronavirus/article-691943.

14. Radaev V. Millenialy na fone predshestvuyushchikh pokolenii: ehmpiricheskii analiz [Millenials Compared to Previous Generations: An Empirical Analysis]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 2018, no. 3, pp. 15–32.

15. Rogozin D., V’yugovskaya E. Tri gipotezy o mediasrede v usloviyakh rasprostraneniya koronavirusa [Three Hypotheses About the Media Content Amidst the Coronavirus Infection]. Gumanitarnyi vektor [Humanitarian Vector], 2021, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 168–178.

16. Schwartz Sh. et al. Utochnennaya teoriya bazovykh individual’nykh tsennostei: primenenie v Rossii [A Refined Theory of Basic Personal Values: Validation in Russia]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ehkonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics], 2012, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 43–70. URL: http://psy-journal.hse.ru/data/2013/10/30/1283379255/Schwartz_et_al_902pp43-70.pdf.

17. Sokolov M. Pokoleniya vmesto klassov? Vozrast i potrebitel’skaya revolyutsiya v Rossii [Generations Instead of Classes? Age and the Consumer Revolution in Russia]. Sotsiologiya vlasti [Sociology of Power], 2019, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 71–91.

18. Sokolov M., Sokolova N. Sredy, a ne klassy: patterny gorizontal’noi stratifikatsii v sovremennoi gorodskoi Rossii [Milieus, Not Classes: Patterns of Horizontal Stratification in Urban Russia]. Ehkonomicheskaya sotsiologiya [Economic Sociology], 2020, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 12–29.

19. Sotsiologiya pandemii. Proekt koronaFOM [Sociology of the Pandemic. Project koronaFOM], Moscow, Institut Fonda “Obshchestvennoe mnenie”, 2021, pp. 93–94.

20. Tighe M., Butler J. Holistic Health and New Age in Britain and the Republic of Ireland. Handbook of New Age (eds D. Kemp, J. R. Lewis), Leiden, Boston, Brill, 2007, pp. 415–434.

21. Wright A., Sonin K., Driscoll J., Wilson J. Poverty and Economic Dislocation Reduce Compliance with COVID-19 Shelter-in-Place Protocols. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 2020, vol. 180, pp. 544–554.

22. Zavadskaya M. COVID-19 i obshchestvennye nastroeniya rossiyan v 2020 godu [COVID-19 and Russian Public Moods in 2020]. Riddle, February 10, 2021. URL: http://ridl.io/ru/covid-19-i-obshhestvennye-nastroenija-rossijan-v-2020-godu/.

23. Zavadskaya M., Sokolov B. Sotsial’no-demograficheskie i lichnostnye osobennosti kovid-skeptikov v Rossii [Social Demographic and Personal Characteristics of Covid Skeptics in Russia]. Sotsiodigger [Sociodigger], 2021, vol. 2, no. 1–2 (7), pp. 47–55.